Posts Tagged ‘dating web sites

27
Jul
10

quite cheeky

I don’t know if any of you were aware, but after I posted last week about the new dating sites Cheekd.com and FlipMe.com, Lori Cheek, the founder of Cheekd.com, actually contacted me through this blog, asking me for my address so she could send me a free trial for the site.

Since I was considering trying it anyway, just for fun, and I am physically incapable of turning down free stuff, I sent her my address, and lo and behold, today I received a small black envelope containing five cards (including my favorite, “Act natural. We can get awkward later”), and instructions on how to set up my account. I didn’t have a chance to get to it today, but hopefully I will tomorrow, and my next great dating experiment can begin.

Stay tuned…

22
Jul
10

online dating: the next generation

It’s official – online dating has swallowed itself and spat itself back out into the real world. How do I know this? Because I was recently (meaning today) made aware of the existence of two brand-new dating web sites, Cheekd.com and Flipme.com, which are looking to shake-up traditional online dating (what a quaint notion) by allowing people to first make in-person contact, and then pursue each other online.

These web sites, along with other new dating technologies like the iPhone app Skout, were profiled today in a New York Times article. Cheek’d and FlipMe basically work like this: when users sign up for a membership, they are sent a pack of 50 (Cheek’d) or 30 (FlipMe) business cards that a flirtatious saying, a code, and the site’s web address. The theory goes that the user will then hand out these cards to people they meet and find attractive; if the person who receives the code is interested, he or she can go to the web site, enter the code, and find their possible paramour’s profile, and go from there. People who receive the cards can use the site for free, while a membership to both sites costs $25 to start. While FlipMe’s cards all have the same saying (“I’ve said ‘what if’ too many times…not this time.”), Cheek’d offers a variety of sayings users can choose from. My personal favorite? “Act natural. We can get awkward later.” Most ill-advised? “Feel free to stalk me.” Probably not something you want to encourage a complete stranger to do… Anyway, if you want to read the full NYT article, go here.

I have to admit, even though I’m done with dating and all that, I was kind of intrigued by these sites at first. It is refreshing after the fake, forced, discouraging and demoralizing process that is old-fashioned online dating, to have something that acts as an easy ice-breaker in the real world, but also translates well into the virtual world where we all feel more comfortable communicating. It gives people a quick way to get to know more about someone (because God forbid our instant-gratification-obsessed generation can’t find your life story online within 5 minutes), and also a rather pain-free way to reject someone; if I give my card to someone and he’s not interested, married, gay, or all three, he doesn’t have to tell me so to my face. He can just never contact me.

But then I started thinking about it, and realized this is just a glorified, $25 way to give someone your phone number or e-mail address. Ok, maybe it’s a cute, fun way to break the ice, but are we so incapable as a society of having an actual conversation that we need little cards to do it for us? And as far as the element of the profile – for absolutely nothing, I could set up a Facebook page solely to serve as a dating profile, slap the URL on some business cards, and hand them out to people, telling them to check out my profile and message me if they’re interested.

Awww, Cheek’d and FlipMe, did I just blow a big-ass hole in your business plan?

Ok, ok, maybe I’m being a little cynical (and cheap). If Cheek’d and FlipMe are working for people, that’s great. Anything that gets people to interact with each other in person instead of through a computer is a huge step as far as I’m concerned. I find it funny, though, that although online dating is fairly new (Match.com was launched in 1995, eHarmony.com in 1997), there’s already a backlash against it, and a movement to shift dating back into the real world. Maybe we haven’t gone full circle yet, but with Cheek’d and FlipMe, we’re getting halfway there.

What are your thoughts on sites like Cheek’d and FlipMe, and apps like Skout? (Since I’m not cool enough to own an iPhone, I don’t feel comfortable commenting on that one. Actually, I do. I think it’s creepy, and I don’t want people being able to use my phone to find me. Screw you, Big Brother.)  Would you use a site like Cheek’d or FlipMe? Leave your thoughts in the comments!

18
Nov
09

back to life, back to reality

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about technology, and how it affects our love lives, probably because I’ve been immersed in a project for one of my grad classes that involves writing a book proposal for a hypothetical book about – surprise, surprise – how technology has affected our love lives.

I was working on this project over the weekend, and, in a hunt for statistics on the number of Match.com subscribers (1.4 million as of June 2009, if you’re curious), found this web site, which offers information and user reviews on over fifty dating and matchmaking web sites.  I was momentarily distracted from my homework (not that distracting me from homework is a particularly challenging task) by the sheer volume and specificity of these web sites.  Sure, you have your big, brand-name general dating sites like Match and eHarmony, but if you want to narrow down your search for a soulmate by race/ethnic background, age group, religion, even income bracket, there’s a web site for you.  There’s even a web site, PositiveSingles.com, for individuals living with STDs (because people with herpes need love too).   (Sorry.)

Anyway, this discovery stopped me in my tracks because, as I sat there reading down the list, I couldn’t help but think to myself, “This is the most ass-backwards system I’ve ever heard of.  We’re all trying to meet people and connect with others – by sitting alone in our houses, hunched over our computers, disengaged from society.  What the hell is wrong with all of us?”

I echoed those thoughts later that night during my phone conversation with Ang.  (If it seems like a lot of posts have recently come out of that Sunday night conversation, you’re absolutely right.  In fact, Ang and I talked about how what we talked about would end up in this blog.  Christ, even my life is meta now.)  Anyhoo, Ang was telling me about how, on the train back to New Jersey after her date with her new gay boyfriend, she actually struck up a live, in-person conversation with an attractive young man (who was Ecuadorian, no less).

“And everybody else on the train must have thought I was crazy, because, you know, people don’t actually talk to each other anymore, let alone talk to a stranger,” Ang said.

I had to agree with her.  “It’s so ridiculous,” I said.  “People always say if you want to meet someone, to go to a coffeeshop or a park or wherever, but you go, and everybody’s sitting there by themselves, listening to their iPods, playing on their computers or iPhones or whatever the fuck thing everybody has these days, not talking to anyone else.  It’s incredible.  We have more ways of communicating and staying in touch than ever, and we’re still completely isolated.”

It’s the irony of the whole thing which just gets under my skin, I suppose.  One has to imagine, that at some point in time, somewhere in this universe, in some coffeeshop or classroom or city park, two lonely, single strangers have sat, mere feet or maybe even inches apart from each other, yet completely unaware of the other’s presence – probably because they’re both too busy plowing through  Match.com profiles.  And that, my friends, is the definition of fucking irony.

I’m not trying to hate on the Internet in general, or dating web sites in particular.  I’m in no position to judge, having been a paying member of Match for a year; it can’t hurt to have as many irons in the fire as possible, I always say.  But it’s a slippery slope, as we all retreat further and further into the isolated, virtual world to find connections, forgetting that there is a whole great big bustling REAL world too, and that your potential soulmate may be out there – maybe even on the train seat next to you.




KristenM129

 

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

Twitter Updates


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.